Joined: Feb. 2006
I'll answer your question AFTER you provide a satisfactory answer to mine.
See previous page of posts if you missed it.
But I do note with considerable amusement that the very first point of your 4 point rejection of the Graf-Welhausen hypothesis is based on the irrationality of taking written records over physical facts.
Why is that OK here and nowhere else?
Goodness, Dave, did you think I meant you when I said 'no hugs for thugs'? Do you think I was correct in my assessment? You seem to, else why do you believe it applies to you?
I'll accept your self-assessment, but I do have to wonder when you began worshiping Kali...
no hugs for thugs,