RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (43) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Will a "Gay Gene" Refute Evolution?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 5287
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: April 25 2006,19:57   

Well, it was too good to last.  Three whole days without Thordaddy’s rancid homophobic stench permeating the place…

All quotes by Thordaddy the bigot

Quote
Gay "marriage" is a means to an end, but represents a major point of cultural contention.  It is a goal in the works finally seeing the light at the end of the tunnel.


Yes, I agree.  The forces of goodness and decency are making progress against assh*le bigots like you.

Quote
Your claim is untenable as you basically claim that gay "marriage" will have no cultural side effects, but your youthful vulgar righteousness says otherwise.


That makes no sense whatsoever

Quote
The whole point of gay "marriage" is to fundamentally change our culture, but you're too bigoted towards "homosexuals" to see it.


The point is to give same sex couples the identical rights now afforded hetero couples.  It’s just icing on the cake if as a result culture moves towards more tolerance and away from hateful bigotry like you espouse.

Quote
We see that gay advocates will once again subvert the American process and instead use the power of the courts to procure themselves "special rights."


The “American process” IS to use the legal system and free elections to achieve equal rights you f*cking moron.  What planet ARE you from?

Quote
This new "special right" will be the power of about 1-2% of the population to dictate to the rest of the 98% what will now become the new definition of what we have know as traditional marriage for centuries.


You mean it will redefine what Thordaddy the bigot has proclaimed as “traditional marriage” - isn't that just tough sh*t for you. The rest of society will still define marriage as a one-on-one legally recognized partnership.  All that’s changing is expanding the definition of who can enter into such legal partnerships, just like the definition has been expanded in the past.

When the tiny minority of inter-religion couples were given their “special right” to marriage, did they dictate a new definition for “traditional marriage” to the rest of society?

When the tiny minority of interracial couples were given their “special right” to marriage, did they dictate a new definition for “traditional marriage” to the rest of society?

Thordaddy, you’re so full of sh*t your eyes are brown.

How’s that petition to marry your five brothers coming?  Any support? Got any more sheep-f*ckers like you to come out of the “cote”?  Are your children really your "kids" and do they call you Thorda-a-a-a-a-a-a-dy? :p

--------------
"CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way"
"All the evidence supports Creation baraminology"
"If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic."
"Jews and Christians are Muslims."

- Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

  
  1264 replies since April 04 2006,15:41 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (43) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]