Joined: Oct. 2006
I made a comment over three hours ago over here:
Why Mathematicians, Computer Scientists, and Engineers Tend to be More Skeptical of Darwinian Claims
But the comment is "still in moderation," so I'll post it here just in case:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Gil wrote: “…we must demonstrate that our stuff can actually work in the real world, or at least that it has a reasonable prospect of working in the real world. ”
That’s right, we have to provide mechanistic descriptions. We produce models.
Tell us, what is the ID model of the history of life? Oh, that’s right you don’t have one; IDists excuse themselves from that.
That’s why great majority of Mathematicians, Computer Scientists, and Engineers find ID to be useless. (On what basis can I speak on behalf of these groups? It’s the same basis you have.)
BTW, for any of you who don't know, I am an engineer myself.
Invoking intelligent design in science is like invoking gremlins in engineering. [after Mark Isaak.]
All models are wrong, some models are useful. - George E. P. Box