RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
JohnW



Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 30 2007,14:37   

Quote (carlsonjok @ Nov. 30 2007,12:23)
Quote (Bob O'H @ Nov. 30 2007,13:19)
OK, the meltdown hasn't happened yet (can we sue Wes if it doesn't?), but we've always got Denyse keeping us abreast of the situation:
   
Quote
Reflections on key recent events: Eminent science journal advises meat puppets to get over “image of God” rubbish
O'Leary

Nothing in the intelligent design controversy is more instructive than a convinced Darwinist making his true position very, very clear.

etc. etc.

The key recent events are the publication of an editorial in Nature.  In June.

That is a recent event.  At least in comparison to her newest entry, that reports breathlessly on a scientific controversy that was resolved almost 130 years ago.

Oh, and also, buy her book.

Which one of you comedians is poachy?

Quote
Maybe it is time we started our own scientific journals in order to get the ground breaking ID research out into the world where the people can decide. We could even start with a blockbuster issue with all the ID papers that have been rejected by Big Science.


Edited by Wesley R. Elsberry on Nov. 30 2007,16:05

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

  
  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]