RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
franky172



Posts: 158
Joined: Jan. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 05 2007,15:17   

Sal doesn't understand that it is Behe's fault that no one understands his argument because although he seems to suggest at some points that the two mutations are not required, his mathematical formalism suggests they are.

IDists will remember this kind of ad-hoc "I accounted for something then didn't account for it" in Dembski's calculations of the probability of evolving a falgellum.

  
  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]