RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Occam's Toothbrush



Posts: 554
Joined: April 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 03 2007,11:34   

Quote (Zachriel @ July 03 2007,11:11)
 
Quote (Zachriel @ July 03 2007,08:53)
   
Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ July 03 2007,06:39)
             
Quote
An eloquent but bogus non-review by Dawkins
scorned'ova

...Dawkins is a master of rhetoric. Only he could take a clear example of intelligently designed evolution (dog breeding) and offer it as a convincing “proof” of Darwinian evolution.

Holy dipshit.  If Sal had some grasp of what Behe is trying to do in TEOE, he would understand Dawkins' review generally, and this point specifically. But he doesn't, so he doesn't, and off he goes after the supposed insufficiency of natural selection.

I wonder if he thinks wild geese were designed.

Dogs are an interesting example. Relatively few mutations in developmental genes can lead to a great deal of morphological plasticity, a longer leg, a shorter snout, a longer body—unlike the common cat whose overall morphology is much less plastic.

In any case, scordova              
Quote
Dawkins is a master of rhetoric. Only he could take a clear example of intelligently designed evolution (dog breeding) and offer it as a convincing “proof” of Darwinian evolution.

And this is the premier blog of Intelligent Design?! They haven't even read Origin of Species, and they've had 148 years.      
Quote
The Origin of Species

Chapter 1: Variation Under Domestication

GilDodgen    
Quote
And don’t forget that dog breeding is the mixing, matching, and reshuffling of existing genetic information, not the creation of new information. The dog genome is unusually plastic.

Oh gee whiz, GilDodgen. There is no poodle hiding in the wolf genome. It requires novel mutations. Breeders sometimes wait a lifetime for a fortuitous mutation. Many have been specifically identified. But if you disagree, all you have to do is make a few predictions. We have the technology. Will dogs just be reshuffled wolf genomes, or will they have novel alleles?

Dog Genome Project

Doncha know, ID makes its predictions after they are confirmed.  Only materialist presuppositionalist atheists like you would have  a problem with that.

--------------
"Molecular stuff seems to me not to be biology as much as it is a more atomic element of life" --Creo nut Robert Byers
------
"You need your arrogant ass kicked, and I would LOVE to be the guy who does it. Where do you live?" --Anger Management Problem Concern Troll "Kris"

  
  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]