RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
franky172



Posts: 158
Joined: Jan. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 24 2007,09:34   

DaveScot forgets that ID explicitly excludes inquiring as to the motivations and intents of the designer, in fact ID explicitly states that the intent and motivations of the designer are immaterial to the question of design.  He makes analogy to forensic sciences:

Quote
Just imagine how useful it would be in criminal investigations if intent could be determined by a mathematical formula


But forensic sciences only work because we know a significant amount about the motivations and intents of the actors under consideration.

Plus, I'm not the first to notice this, but are IDists now admitting that CSI is a subjective measure?  Wasn't the whole point of the design inference that there was no subjective aspect to the "explanatory filter"?!

  
  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]