2ndclass
Posts: 182
Joined: June 2006
|
| Quote (Jim_Wynne @ April 19 2007,10:32) | | I don't think there's much doubt that Joe is the most stupidest of the stupid. |
I'm afraid I'll have to agree. A few random goodies from a recent "conversation" with him:
Joe: | Quote | | A computer's future state does not depend on its current state. |
| Quote | | There isn't any way to objectively test the premise that chimps and humans shared a common ancestor and I know there isn't anything in any journals about it. |
| Quote | | If I were involved [with the Dover trial] the outcome would have been different. |
| Quote | | Philosophers of science set up the rules by which science plays. |
| Quote | Me: The fact remains that Dembski invented the term "Explanatory Filter", and he alone defined it to refer to a series of steps.
Joe: I doubt you are correct. |
| Quote | Me: The first step [of the EF] is to ask whether the event has high probability under a chance hypothesis.
Joe: That is false. |
| Quote | Me: CSI is measured in bits.
Joe: Wrong. |
And for some double howlers, watch Joe demonstrate that he doesn't know what "strawman" means, and simultaneously deny that computers operate via fixed law and chance:
| Quote | | It is also a strawman to say that computers operate via fixed law and chance. |
| Quote | | And in the end to say that computers run via fixed law and chance is a strawman. |
--------------
"I wasn't aware that classical physics had established a position on whether intelligent agents exercising free were constrained by 2LOT into increasing entropy." -DaveScot
|
