Joined: April 2006
|Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Mar. 16 2007,09:38)|
|Quote (carlsonjok @ Mar. 16 2007,08:53)|
|It is often said here that the ID movement has gotten to the point where the genuine article is virtually indistinguisable from parody. Will it please the court to recognize the Plaintiffs Exhibit No 1968. |
In this exhibit, we have a known ID proponent arguing that the theory of evolution must be a theory of abiogenesis:
|Consider the title chosen for Darwin's famous book… "Origin of Species." I would suppose that the first form of life to appear on this planet was some species of something.|
And a bit later:
|What this all boils down to is that essentially there can be no difference between the phrases "origin of species" and "origin of life." If you explain the origin of species, you will have explained the origin of life. So, to defend Darwinism by asserting that it's not a theory about the origin of life seems rather absurd.|
Okay, seriously. Which one of you guys stole TRoutMac's password and posted this?
|I admit that I also believe, in one sense, that humans are "related" to rocks.|
The stupIDs seem to operate on the assumption that since ID is 100% right and evolution 100% wrong, any and all arguments that might support ID and/or discredit evolution are therefore correct. No argument is too idiotic to embrace, if it can be construed to support ID.
"Molecular stuff seems to me not to be biology as much as it is a more atomic element of life" --Creo nut Robert Byers
"You need your arrogant ass kicked, and I would LOVE to be the guy who does it. Where do you live?" --Anger Management Problem Concern Troll "Kris"