Joined: April 2006
This quizzlestick person over at OE must be loki. I mean, come on:
|Critics of Intelligent Design often present the same few objections to our theory: They claim that we do not yet offer a testable theory, and that we avoid peer-review of our discoveries because we have something to hide.|
Yep, the same tired old objections to our theory: 1) You don't have one. 2) There's no legitimate research to back up the theory you don't have.
I mean come on, evolutionistas, is that the best argument against ID theory you can come up with? That it doesn't exist? As we all know, you can't prove a negative, so the theory that there is no ID theory is itself fallacious. QED, design.
|Those of us who have spent hard years grappling with the finer points of Intelligent Design know that nothing could be further from the truth: There is no group I know who work harder to attempt to explain these difficult scientific topics than ourselves.|
We don't have time to do scientific research, we're too busy "explaining the difficult scientific concepts." To ourselves.
|Intelligent Design is the tiny-seed from which will grow an enormous tree of science|
It's a lot bigger when it's hard, I swear. No really. Stop! Come back!
"Molecular stuff seems to me not to be biology as much as it is a more atomic element of life" --Creo nut Robert Byers
"You need your arrogant ass kicked, and I would LOVE to be the guy who does it. Where do you live?" --Anger Management Problem Concern Troll "Kris"