Joined: June 2006
|I'd like to know who is the final arbiter of what should or should not be considered a "peer review" paper? And where does this person's biases lie?|
Seriously, I realize there is no single person with such responsibility. I trust the point of this rhetorical question is understood, nonetheless.
By golly, he's onto something. In my opinion, everything I agree with is peer-reviewed (including this post), and everything I disagree with isn't. My opinion on this is as good as anyone else's, right?
"I wasn't aware that classical physics had established a position on whether intelligent agents exercising free were constrained by 2LOT into increasing entropy." -DaveScot