RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
2ndclass



Posts: 182
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 24 2007,15:01   

Says TRoutMac:    
Quote
I'd like to know who is the final arbiter of what should or should not be considered a "peer review" paper? And where does this person's biases lie?

Seriously, I realize there is no single person with such responsibility. I trust the point of this rhetorical question is understood, nonetheless.

By golly, he's onto something.  In my opinion, everything I agree with is peer-reviewed (including this post), and everything I disagree with isn't.  My opinion on this is as good as anyone else's, right?

--------------
"I wasn't aware that classical physics had established a position on whether intelligent agents exercising free were constrained by 2LOT into increasing entropy." -DaveScot

  
  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]