RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 12 2007,10:28   

I think this question, posed by WAD, was supposed to be a breaking ball, but it didn't break, and instead hung right over the plate:
 
Quote
Is it that ID proponents donít understand evolution or that we understand it well enough and think itís bogus?

I, for one, have never read or heard an account of evolutionary mechanisms, offered by advocates of ID, that accurately presented the many facets of contemporary evolutionary theory and the evidence that supports it. †Never.

So the question should be, Do the distorted, straw-accounts of evolutionary theory and the evidence that supports it presented by ID theorists reflect misunderstanding, or deliberate distortion and dishonesty?

Of course, the answser varies. Most of the idiots commenting at UD clearly don't, in fact, have (or want) a clue vis genuine evolutionary biology or its implications.

Others (WAD, Meyers, Wells) almost certainly understand evolutionary theory, and instead embark on a program of deliberate distortion.

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]