RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
2ndclass



Posts: 182
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 03 2006,07:19   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Nov. 03 2006,12:15)
   
Quote
....If anyone has a problem with that they can KMA. Google that.

HOO RAH! Semper Fi!

Comment by DaveScot — May 22, 2006 @ 12:49 pm

A quick search of UD gives the lie to Dave's self-righteous appeal to this rule.  (Where can I find this rule, BTW?)

DaveScot:    
Quote
In a pig’s a** (pardon my french).
(censorship mine)

and here  
Quote
You’ve got one more chance to demonstrate you’re not a stupid little troll before I boot your a** out of here. -ds
(censorship mine)

and here  
Quote
Open-forum my a**.
(censorship mine)

Not to mention the fact that Dembski has quoted the s word at least twice, with no hint of disapproval.

--------------
"I wasn't aware that classical physics had established a position on whether intelligent agents exercising free were constrained by 2LOT into increasing entropy." -DaveScot

  
  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]