Joined: Oct. 2006
Hello, first post from a long-time lurker, I tried to resist, but this was just too much.
I looked over the paper the UD crowd are salivating over. Not exactly stellar scientific work. It appears to consist of nothing more than a series of unsupported assertions about 'information', bolstered by a slew of nonsensical buzzwords. I kept flicking back, trying to find some actual evidence for, well, anything, but that doesnt appear to have been a priority. Nor, for that matter, does coherence.
I feel sorry for the other poor souls who have published in this online journal - hopefully they will take a look at the peer review standards before they become a laughing stock.