RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Jake



Posts: 50
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 30 2006,12:38   

Hello, first post from a long-time lurker, I tried to resist, but this was just too much.

I looked over the paper the UD crowd are salivating over. Not exactly stellar scientific work. It appears to consist of nothing more than a series of unsupported assertions about 'information', bolstered by a slew of nonsensical buzzwords. I kept flicking back, trying to find some actual evidence for, well, anything, but that doesnt appear to have been a priority. Nor, for that matter, does coherence.

I feel sorry for the other poor souls who have published in this online journal - hopefully they will take a look at the peer review standards before they become a laughing stock.

  
  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]