Joined: Jan. 2006
Joseph is now schooling Allen. Too funny.
| Joseph // Oct 18th 2006 at 2:40 pm |
Until then, it’s all airy speculation…
I would agree with that. That is is ALL airy speculation, even evolutionary biology and especially common descent.
I am also sure that anyone can fail to understand “No Free Lunch” and “The Design Inference”.
However given the materialistic alternative to ID is “sheer-dumb-luck”, sooner or later people, ie the general population, will start to realize that all objections to ID are nothing more than philosphical whinings.
As for “unambiguously” well with science you give it your best shot with the knowledge/ data available. Then future research can/will either confirm or refute the initial inference.
And BTW ball point pens and flashlights are just as “natural” as a bacterium or a maple tree. That is they exist in nature. And although we can say with confidence that neither ball point pens nor flashlights were produced by nature (acting freely) we have no idea how a bacterium nor a maple tree was originally produced- by nature operating freely or by intentional design.
Comment by Joseph — October 18, 2006 @ 2:40 pm
Uncommon Descent is a moral cesspool, a festering intellectual ghetto that intoxicates and degrades its inhabitants - Stephen Matheson