RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
2ndclass



Posts: 182
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 09 2006,06:38   

Carlson's interlocutor on OE:
Quote
As I've indicated before, one assumption of naturalism is that we have accurately staked out the bounds of "nature", that we've already taken an exhaustive "inventory" of the natural world.

Quite the irony.  In fact, it's the IDers who think that our understanding of nature is complete.  Why else would we need to appeal to the supernatural when we don't have an exhaustive explanation for something?

--------------
"I wasn't aware that classical physics had established a position on whether intelligent agents exercising free were constrained by 2LOT into increasing entropy." -DaveScot

  
  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]