Joined: June 2006
|And they do so because that is much easier than substantiating their own claims or actually learning what ID really is.|
Well, he got one thing right -- it is very hard to learn what ID really is. You could get a PhD in biology and read every article in every biology journal in existence and still not know what it is. If you read the pop-sci books and articles put out by Dembski et al, you get a word salad of ambiguous terms and incoherent arguments, with IDers contradicting other IDers in the big tent.
Don't even try to learn what ID is. Stick with something easy, like quantum physics.
"I wasn't aware that classical physics had established a position on whether intelligent agents exercising free were constrained by 2LOT into increasing entropy." -DaveScot