RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Chris Hyland



Posts: 705
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 22 2006,05:09   

Quote
Thus we see in Dembski massive denial, facile dismissal pretty much on par with Behe's demonstration at Dover.


Basically ID's claim seems to come down to 'if you cant provide Behes crazy level of detail for complex systems' then you cant infer that evolution isnt goal directed. Once you strip away all the jargon and maths that is all it is.

  
  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]