RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Benny H



Posts: 34
Joined: May 2008

(Permalink) Posted: May 21 2008,13:34   

Quote (Richardthughes @ May 21 2008,12:43)
ID Gives up on empiricism:

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....re-3360

Quote
21 May 2008
This Site Gives me 150 Utils of Utility; Panda’s Thumb Gives me Only 3
BarryA
Any effort to give precise gradations of quantification to CSI is doomed to failure.....


Point and laugh at the whole thing yourselves.

So after much navel gazing, we return to "But it LOOKS designed (to me)"

ID - No mechanism
ID - No statistical test

Talk about "own goal." If you or I were to comment that CSI is entirely subjective and not objective the IDiots would ban us, but BarryA says it and the IDiots respond "great observation!"

  
  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]