Joined: June 2007
[Graffiti moved to Bathroom Wall. - Lou FCD]
|Quote (RFJE @ Feb. 08 2009,21:00)|
|Quote (Kristine @ Feb. 08 2009,19:41)|
|My question is why am I labeled as a propagandist when I consider evidence logically and come up with the conclusion that the mathematical improbability of life starting randomly by solely naturalistic means is astronomically high.|
Solipsism is not logic.
Define "astronomically high."
Kristine, I'm not a philosopher. Doesn't solipsism say that there is no external world and that only what is in my own mind that is reality. I guess your saying my question is an evaluation in my own mind that my thoughts were logical.
You can evaluate my statements and the conclusion that I make. Evolution is claiming itself to be "fact." SO you all are putting the burden of proof on yourselves. The champion is always challenged.
I gave chemistry facts that would hinder or prevent spontaneous generation--not theories. I never get answers--just usually names, or diversions by one means or another.
I think she may have meant sophism, which is the rhetorical art of speaking out of ones posterior.
To rebut creationism you pretty much have to be a biologist, chemist, geologist, philosopher, lawyer and historian all rolled into one. While to advocate creationism, you just have to be an idiot. -- tommorris