RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (2) < [1] 2 >   
  Topic: Waterloo In Dover, Kitzmiller et al. v. DASD< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
evopeach



Posts: 248
Joined: July 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 06 2005,05:01   

Zotster = Moron

Please tell me how the design by a team of intelligent engineers and scientists acting from outside of all the matter involved which of itself could never make anything resembling a TV set of any kind, hybridizing their conscious, planned, directed and organized thoughts, talents and experiences with the aid  of a host of tools and devices similarly produced by others bears any remote resemblance to the unplanned, uncaring, undesigned, random process of "random mutation" and natural selection.

Why is it that dunderheads like you can't see that the idea of a designer acting exactly like the above TV designers is entirely consistent with human experience, the only way things are designed and manufactured and never by the evolutionary method which is completely at odds with our own observations and practice is precisely what ID predicts ... as in Man thinks God's thoughts after Him being designed in His image.

How so called intelligent people can propose explanations that are totally at odds with observation, practice, common sense and even their own methods in doing science is purely illogical and irrational.

If concepts and devices and methods  were developed by evolutionary processes fire wouldn't even have been harnessed for cooking and such.

Your head is so far up your ---- you are starving for air.

  
  43 replies since Sep. 23 2005,11:11 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (2) < [1] 2 >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]