Joined: Jan. 2006
|Quote (improvius @ Jan. 18 2006,16:18)|
|Quote (Mr_Christopher @ Jan. 18 2006,14:28)|
|Well it would sure make God look like a goof ball if it turned out the intelligent designer was in fact a space alien or time traveler (as Behe suggest) and not God.|
Someone should ask Luskin if it is not God, and in fact a space man, where does that leave God's role?
For that matter, how could we even tell the difference between God and a technologically advanced alien or time traveler?
Well according to scripture, God looks sort of like us. And according to Star Trek, space aliens look more like iguanas on a real bad hair day.
So I think we'd be able to tell who is who in a line up. Assuming of course scritpure and Star Trek are reliable sources.
Too bad this subject is off limits for ID cultists. Talk about a science stopper, they are not allowed to dive into what/who the intelligent designer is.
Is there any other "scientific theory" other than intelligent design creationism that states
B proves A exists but you are not allowed to discuss or contemplate A.
And of course discussing A will get you banned from Dembskis intelligent design creationism blog. Why does the Dicovery Institute and their loyal army of true believers try to stifle free speech and scientific inquiry into the nature of the intelligent designer?
Uncommon Descent is a moral cesspool, a festering intellectual ghetto that intoxicates and degrades its inhabitants - Stephen Matheson