RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (58) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Evolution of the horse; a problem for Darwinism?, For Daniel Smith to present his argument< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
mitschlag



Posts: 236
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 19 2008,06:42   

Quote (Daniel Smith @ Feb. 18 2008,19:37)
I think that maybe Neoteny could apply to the coral example, but I don't see how it would apply to the ammonoid example - since both lineages continued in their respective development after the "switch" took effect.

Remember, you're dealing with enormous populations here, subject to differing environmental conditions (selective pressures) that vary over space and time.

There's no a priori reason to assume a global switchover independent of selective forces (despite Schindewolf's partiality to such notions).

--------------
"You can establish any “rule” you like if you start with the rule and then interpret the evidence accordingly." - George Gaylord Simpson (1902-1984)

  
  1733 replies since Sep. 18 2007,15:27 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (58) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]