RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (58) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Evolution of the horse; a problem for Darwinism?, For Daniel Smith to present his argument< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 15 2008,03:02   

Quote (Daniel Smith @ Feb. 14 2008,20:01)
Perhaps, but I'd like to believe that--taken altogether--the sheer volume of such evolutionary steps lends itself more to a 'preprogrammed plan' explanation than to 'trial and error' and chance.  

That said, Schindewolf would agree with you, not me, about the need for 'divine intervention'.

Over what timescales are we talking about here Daniel?

And as 99%+ of everything that's ever lived is extinct it's not much of a plan is it really?

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
  1733 replies since Sep. 18 2007,15:27 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (58) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]