RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 03 2008,06:58   

Does DaveScot say more them he means to?
Quote
How can we say whether or not random mutation and natural selection was sufficient to produce the end state when we don’t know what the start state was?

He continues digging
Quote
And no, we don’t need to know anything at all about the intelligent designer. All we need to know is what is reasonably possible absent a designer.

Huh? He explains...
Quote
If the change we observe goes beyond what we believe is reasonably possible without a designer then we make a design inference.

Ahh, it's all clear now. So, was that an example of the explanatory filter then?
Of course the legendary DS ego makes it's inevitable appearance
Quote
Is this rocket science or something so complex that it just goes over the heads of Darwin’s faithful so I might as well be trying to teach a hamster how to balance a checkbook as describe how to make a design inference to an ebola boy?

It’s very frustrating because this is just straightforward, simple problem solving to me.

Simple problem solving? Then please do demonstrate. Give us a worked example!

So Davescot, I know you read this thread.

Please demonstrate the design inference for me. In the same message you say
Quote
Of course we’ll have to make more estimations of the probabilistic resources such as how long the period of time rm+ns had to work, how many potential replications (opportunities to produce change), and the mutation rate of the organism.

We could get all that, or at least a close enough approximation, just by knowing the species from which the sequence came. In the real world we would know the species we were dealing with.

So, pick an organism/sequence that has the documentation you desire and attempt the "design inference" please.

Tard

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]