improvius
Posts: 807
Joined: Jan. 2006
|
[quote=thordaddy,Mar. 27 2006,19:59][/quote]
The biggest problem is that nothing you write makes any sense. There is no logic whatsoever connecting your statements. Examples:
| Quote | | Science already admits that it cannot deny the existence of an IDer, but science can't admit to it either because there is NO empirical evidence. |
So science simultaneously admits something and yet can't admit it. This makes no sense whatsoever.
| Quote | | This actually means that empirical evidence may exist, but it can't be "observed." |
This makes no sense AND demonstrates that you don't know what the word "empirical" means.
| Quote | | This in turn means it may be observed (faith/belief), but it cannot be measured. |
You're building on your previous nonsense, which obviously isn't getting you anywhere.
| Quote | | Yet, as we see, science readily makes predictions about unique phenomenon (psychology). |
This doesn't seem to have ANYTHING to do with your previous statements. The term "unique phenonmenon" is also confusing. It is unclear what you are trying to say about psychology.
--------------
| Quote (afdave @ Oct. 02 2006,18:37) | Many Jews were in comfortable oblivion about Hitler ... until it was too late.
Many scientists will persist in comfortable oblivion about their Creator ... until it is too late. |
|
