Zachriel
Posts: 2723
Joined: Sep. 2006
|
| Quote | kairosfocus: {Evo Mat assertion} No intelligence was involved or could be involved.
vs
{ID start-point for the design inference} Intelligence causation might be involved. |
I think I see your problem right there.
1 -> 'Evo-Mat' is a strawman.
2 -> 'Evo-Mat' is diversionary (appeal to emotion).
3 -> The first statement is false. No scientist precludes intelligent involvement a priori.
4 -> False dichotomy.
{snip all that follows from faulty premises.}
--------------
You never step on the same tard twice—for it's not the same tard and you're not the same person.
|
