IanBrown_101
Posts: 927
Joined: April 2007
|
| Quote (Thought Provoker @ Jan. 27 2008,17:44) | Hi all,
Actually Keiths you are correct on two fronts, in that I now understand Minkowskian geometry is generally considered to be flat not curved and, therefore, is mostly a reformation of special relativity. And you are right in tha I will call it a semantics problem because I have been thinking in terms of a flexible Minkowskian geometry that could be either flat or curved. |
"Hi everyone. You know, X is Y not Z, and a lot of you have been pointing this out to me, but I'm still right because I'm saying X might be Y or Z."
Seriously, are you THAT good at doublethink?
--------------
I'm not the fastest or the baddest or the fatest.
You NEVER seem to address the fact that the grand majority of people supporting Darwinism in these on line forums and blogs are atheists. That doesn't seem to bother you guys in the least. - FtK
Roddenberry is my God.
|
