Stephen Elliott
Posts: 1776
Joined: Oct. 2005
|
| Quote (thordaddy @ Mar. 23 2006,17:56) | Faid,
You don't seem to understand that ID will never be proven wrong, but can only be proven right. You also don't seem to understand that the path to providing evidence for an IDer is within the EVER expanding scope of science. The very same science you naively believe to be strict and static. Once you bend the rules, you have no say in others bending the rules. Get it? |
Nope. You are the one missing the point. The FSM can also never be proven wrong, but it could be proven right.
This is what makes these claims unscientific.
The whole point of science theories is that they could be proven wrong.
The rest of your post meanders into confusion once again. Why are you unable to post simple ideas in a simple way?
Science is anything but static. The best theory/hypothesis changes regularly. Atoms where once considered indivisible, nuclear physics changed that. Newtonian gravity was considered correct and Einstein changed that.
These examples prove that the claim of science as dogma are lies. The most celebrated and rewarded scientists are the ones that overturn universally accepted ideas.
The only thing science demands is evidence. Provide that and scientists will happily abandon cherished ideas.
|
