RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (7) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Comparing Dembski and Mike Gene, Story of two attempts to infer design< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Jim_Wynne



Posts: 1208
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 05 2008,11:14   

Quote (Thought Provoker @ Jan. 05 2008,10:50)
I happen to be a free-lance independent with anti-religious leanings.  Those more loyal to the ID Movement would be perfectly happy for you to continue napping in you Group Think induced stupor.

You have predictably misidentified the soporific agent.  ID proponents who have trouble with the idea of randomness demonstrate on a regular basis that either they don't understand the concept, or do understand it and use it to to provoke amenable thoughts in those who don't.  Your quantum navel-gazing adds nothing of substance.

--------------
Evolution is not about laws but about randomness on happanchance.--Robert Byers, at PT

  
  204 replies since Jan. 04 2008,22:07 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (7) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]