RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (7) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Comparing Dembski and Mike Gene, Story of two attempts to infer design< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Art



Posts: 69
Joined: Dec. 2002
(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 05 2008,11:05   
TP, I'm very aware of the antipathy that ID proponents have for the concept of randomness. IMO, this stance reflects a distinct lack of critical and careful thinking, as randomness really is beside the point when it comes to ID.  ID proponents who think otherwise simply haven't thought things through.

Just trying to provoke some thought here   :p

Edited by Art on Jan. 05 2008,11:13
   
  204 replies since Jan. 04 2008,22:07 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (7) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]