Erasmus, FCD
Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007
|
| Quote (VMartin @ Dec. 27 2007,14:36) | | Quote (Alan Fox @ Dec. 27 2007,14:08) | | Quote | | But they are wrong, because descending of testicles has meaning beyond any neodarwinian paradigma. |
Well, you've got my attention, now. Please do tell, Martin. The meaning of descending testicles is... |
You know, some outdated theory no one cares anymore. Something like German mysticism. Polarity of mammalian bodies, two centres. Head and reproduction organs on the opposite side of the body. Centre of individuality and centre of species proliferation as opposing principles which are now displayed. Maybe not worth of mentioning for you.
But this time darwinists have not better stance with the cooling sperms bullshits. |
You're the one that said this, you fool.
--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK
Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG
the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat
I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles
|
