Seven Popes
Posts: 190
Joined: Mar. 2006
|
Yeah, what about the tasty wordsmithing in posts 20 & 21? | Quote | #20
In response to comment #7,
you mentioned that, in an article written while Clinton was President,Bush objected to “moving the goalposts”. How is that possible? The set-asides were discussed under GW Bush.
No, I didn’t say that. You inferred it. I suggest you read the SciAm article I linked, reread what I originally said, then try commenting again with the chip removed from your shoulder. -ds
Comment by doramia — March 21, 2006 @ 9:26 am
#21
Here is the Scientific American article I referenced earlier.
http://www.sciamdigital.com/gsp_qpd....0C719A7
It is from the February 2001 issue which I would have received in the mail probably in December of 2000. Clinton was still president but Bush was president-elect.
When I said “this was written up in Scientific American while Clinton was still president” I of course didn’t mean that Bush’s subsequent veto was part of the article. The article is about the reneging on forestation credits.
Comment by DaveScot — March 21, 2006 @ 10:11 am
|
Italics mine. Kinda looks like an admission.
--------------
Cave ab homine unius libri - Beware of anyone who has just one book.
|
