Antievolution.org :: Antievolution.org Discussion Board The Critic's Resource on Antievolution

Antievolution.org Discussion Board > From the Panda's Thumb > After the Bar Closes... > Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >

cogzoid Posts: 234 Joined: Sep. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,16:03    The stack of papers being referred to here are about the evolution of the bac flag, right?  They present testable hypothesis of varying plausibility, right? The IDers, from Behe to Dembski, say that those hypotheses don't exist, or they are not sufficient.  Well, what do they have to offer for an alternate theory?  That "someone" did "something" at "sometime"?  How exactly do we test that theory? How do you think science works, FTK?

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >

Track this topic	Email this topic	Print this topic

© 2002-2009 Antievolution.org Powered by Ikonboard 3.0.2a © 2001 Ikonboard