thordaddy
Posts: 486
Joined: Jan. 2006
|
stevestory opines,
Empiracally paultry? First of all it's 'paltry', and second of all, I hear that all beliefs are based on studying the empirical evidence, so I don't know how you could say mine wasn't. Now will the lot of you start your own thread? it's rude to hijack mine.
How am I hijacking your thread when my question was in direct reference to the thread? And before you start doing spelling checks for me, try your own (empiracally??).
What does post-ID mean? Such a thing has never existed as far as I know? Could you explain?
Renier,
Let's try the reductionist method and ask how the FIRST human acquired his "faith" in an IDer?
|
