RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (341) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: UnReasonable Kansans thread, AKA "For the kids"< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Arden Chatfield



Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 10 2007,11:54   

Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ Nov. 10 2007,06:53)
 
Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Nov. 10 2007,06:44)
http://www.intelligentdesign.org/whatisid.php
Is intelligent design a scientific theory?
         
Quote
Yes. The scientific method is commonly described as a four-step process involving observations, hypothesis, experiments, and conclusion. Intelligent design begins with the observation that intelligent agents produce complex and specified information (CSI). Design theorists hypothesize that if a natural object was designed, it will contain high levels of CSI. Scientists then perform experimental tests upon natural objects to determine if they contain complex and specified information. One easily testable form of CSI is irreducible complexity, which can be discovered by experimentally reverse-engineering biological structures to see if they require all of their parts to function. When ID researchers find irreducible complexity in biology, they conclude that such structures were designed.


observations, hypothesis, experiments, and conclusion?

FTK, care to give us a *single example* of ID science with observations, hypothesis, experiments, and conclusions?
Note the inclusion of "experiments".
Also any examples at all of            
Quote
Scientists then perform experimental tests upon natural objects to determine if they contain complex and specified information

Do they? Do they really? Any example?

Luv, I can give you millions of examples but what would be the f**king use? To me you just attack people before they can even open their mouths and show another way of thinking. THAT's what science is all about, showing another way of thinking and objectively examining them in light of their conclusions, without the preconceptions of materialism that limit the evidence and blind the experimentarians. The "scientists" so admired at AtBC twist exploit facts and experiments to pursue their foreclosed agendas pure and simple, but the emperor has no new clothes. They look at a couple of teeth that probably fell out of the dentist's dusty trash bin and conclude blob to man when it was a missing filling. And bones behind the Chicken Emporium mean dinosaurs sprouted beaks and wings. Give me a beak, who believes that? I'm sure Dembski has performed LOTS of experiments, hon, why don't you just call him up? He has answers for every objection no matter how apparently correct.  

So go get your own observations, hypothesis, and experiments. I love you but ours is already done and we are already at the conclusions, Hon. Anyone can see that they're true.

Too good. You should be worried.

'Give me a beak', 'foreclosed agendas': niiiiiice.

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

  
  10202 replies since Mar. 17 2007,23:38 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (341) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]