RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (58) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Evolution of the horse; a problem for Darwinism?, For Daniel Smith to present his argument< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Jim_Wynne



Posts: 1208
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 10 2007,10:04   

Quote (Daniel Smith @ Nov. 09 2007,23:42)
Quote (Jim_Wynne @ Nov. 09 2007,22:22)
   
Quote
Pick one and lets look at the experimental evidence showing it's capabilities towards creating complex functional systems.

Define "complex" and tell us how we can identify it, and what the delimiter is between complex and not-complex.  While you're at it, you might also want to tell us what you think a "functional system" is.

Suggested reading.

I've done my reading, and unlike you, I've actually learned from it.  Unless you're willing to define your terms in your own words, we have no way of knowing what you're talking about, and you are free to move the goalposts at will. So I'll ask again:
1) What do you mean by "complex," how do you identify it, and what are the empirical delimiters between "complex" and not-complex?
2) How do you define "functional system"?

--------------
Evolution is not about laws but about randomness on happanchance.--Robert Byers, at PT

  
  1733 replies since Sep. 18 2007,15:27 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (58) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]