RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (13) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Coloration of animals, mimicry, aposematism, Is really natural selection behind it?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Arden Chatfield



Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 09 2007,17:53   

Quote (VMartin @ Nov. 09 2007,17:49)
Quote (Erasmus @ FCD,Nov. 09 2007,17:29)
your 'facts' aren't what you claim them to be.  that's the whole problem.

from what you posted, mcatee collected absolutely no data about the relative abundances of prey items in the bird stomachs.  

you can get nowhere from there.

now, if you have an alternate theory, let's hear it.  you don't have to accept anything, of course.  you are completely free in this world to be as dumb as you can make yourself.  

but you claim things are incorrect for reasons which turn out to be incorrect themselves.  that's a different story from the one you would wish to tell.


***edited 'heikertinger' to 'macatee'

I see. You must be very wise. You must have been stung by a wasp as a child. Because of it ornitologist and entomologist McAtee was wrong and you are right. Sleep well.

Marty, do you really think we should throw out the last hundred+ years of evolutionary biology and replace it with nothing?

Because, as long as you offer no alternative, that's what you're proposing.

I must say, Marty, 'Darwinism' correctly explains far far more than you do.

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

  
  365 replies since Sep. 21 2007,11:31 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (13) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]