Russell
Posts: 1082
Joined: April 2005
|
Avocationist, in response to a suggestion that he had tacitly accepted "natural selection":| Quote | | It just won't work. Random mutation isn't capable. Find more mechanisms. That one won't do. |
It's important to keep your terms straight. "natural selection" and "random mutation" are two completely separate things. When you say "random mutation isn't capable": capable of what? Incapable of supplying the raw material for natural selection to act on? What evidence do you rely on, other than your personal incredulity? And when you say "random mutation", are you talking just about point mutations, or are you including chromosomal rearrangements, transpositions, duplications, etc.?
--------------
Must... not... scratch... mosquito bite.
|
