RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
phonon



Posts: 396
Joined: Nov. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 29 2007,18:33   

http://www.uncommondescent.com/off-top....re-2373

DaveScot
 
Quote
I was reading the 2007 IPCC report’s 2007 Physical Science Basis and it came as a surprise how much variance there is from year to year in how atmospheric CO2 increases.
Translation: "Yeah, I actually did some reading and I realized that I don't really know enough about global warming to draw the sweeping conclusions I have drawn in the past, so based on this new information, let me make a few sweeping conclusions."

 
Quote
t seems like it might be much more economically viable and beneficially desirable to pursue reforestation instead of reducing CO2 emissions.
Why even bother if CO2 has nothing to do with global warming?

And I'm not sure where he got the 100% figure, but CO2 obviously doesn't reduce by 100% before it increases by 100% and it obviously doesn't double year to year.

--------------
With most men, unbelief in one thing springs from blind belief in another. - Georg Christoph Lichtenberg

To do just the opposite is also a form of imitation. - Georg Christoph Lichtenberg

  
  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]