stevestory
Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005
|
If the data is clear but confusing, you need to be interpreting it through a different model. If you try reading UD under the model 'these people, and especially Davetard, are revolutionary, highly learned scientists', you're going to be confused immediately.
Why does global warming come up so often?
Why do they also disagree with cancer researchers about cancer, information theorists about information theory, virus researchers about HIV, etc etc.
Why are legitimate scientists quickly banned from the site?
Why can't they find enough papers to publish even their quarterly journal?
Why are they contacting school boards?
What's this Wedge business?
etc
etc
etc
If you change your model slightly, and interpret UD under the model 'these people are clueless and arrogant, and Davetard is a poor man's Rush Limbaugh', all those questions have obvious answers.
|
