Louis
Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006
|
| Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Jan. 24 2007,18:09) | | Quote |
AH the old "reading for comprehension" problem. Et tu it would appear Wesley.
|
Right back at you. I did not endorse Avocationist's notions; I was pointing out where they may have come from.
You can certainly take it from there, though I think that if you insist on speaking in code that the force of the "context" argument is much reduced, and the point about prediction rather than description is far too subtle for readers like Avocationist to appreciate on first misreading.
For someone who believes their words should be studied in the sort of loving detail required of the scholastics, you certainly didn't render that same attention to mine. |
Touche et pointe!
Now THIS is why arguing with someone with a brain is a true joy.
I was wrong Wesley, and being slightly naughty. My apologies and thanks.
Louis
--------------
Bye.
|
