The Ghost of Paley
Posts: 1703
Joined: Oct. 2005
|
| Quote | | Therefore, there's no need for any rebuttal, since I haven't made any rebuttable assertions. However, my difficulties with higher mathematics shouldn't present an obstacle to you, since the currently-existing theory accounting for the above-referenced observations has been able to explain those observations without resorting to the sort of difficult mathematical formalisms favored by (what's his name again?) The Master(sm)(?). I have every confidence you'll be able to do the same. |
Fair enough. Actually, my first summary was a failed effort in that direction. I'll expand my abstracts a little more in the future. And by the way:
Dembski -> The Wizard
Berlinski -> The Master.
--------------
Dey can't 'andle my riddim.
|
