deadman_932
Posts: 3094
Joined: May 2006
|
Here's another example. You cited Gladwin on dendro. Gladwin made specific claims on dendrochronology, all of which were untrue. I gave you a mountain of citations on how deciduous trees were used, and have been used and continue to be used, contrary to Gladwin. I showed how his claims on conifers were wrong. I showed how he was a crank who was not an archaeologist and not a dendrologist. Your response is that this is NOT a quote mine?
Then you offer up "Dr." Don Batten again as defense, despite me pointing out on 4 separate occasions that Batten was working with farmed trees in New Zealand ( Pinus radiata) and didn't MENTION that part. He also cited two instances out of hundreds of thousands in which a dendro paper was withdrawn. That's it. That's the sum of it.
BUT YOU STILL USED THE CLAIMS OF A CRANK NON-DENDROLOGIST, WHO HAD STATED FACTUAL UNTRUTHS. And you did it knowingly.
Then you say this, most amusingly: | Quote | | You also are not a dendro expert, yet you claim that you know more than Gladwin. |
This sounds amazingly like you claiming to know what fields of archaeology I have worked in. YOU are claiming to KNOW that I have no expertise or am NOT expert in analyzing dendro cores? Taking them? Sequencing? Gosh, you think there's a SEPARATE degree for dendro in archaeology?
This is exactly like your claims to "know" my religious views...like your claim to "know" that I had never worked with jungle tribes....like your claim to "know" that I "didn't care about kids" .
You're a sick man, Davey-boy.
--------------
AtBC Award for Thoroughness in the Face of Creationism
|
