Bob O'H
Posts: 2564
Joined: Oct. 2005
|
Someone bitter?
http://www.uncommondescent.com/archives/1675#comment-67337
| Quote | 5. John A. Davison // Oct 6th 2006 at 9:46 am
It will be very interesting to see how the Darwimps here as elsewhere will respond to these comments by a member of the National Academy of Sciences.
Here is my prediction. He will probably be accused of senility. After all that is what they have done with me.
Or how about this one?
“He used to be a decent scientist but something happened to him in the 1980s.”
It is especially significant that Skell saw through Dobzhansky’s claim about how nothing makes sense in biology without evolution. The Darwinians conveniently forget that Dobzhansky is also the one that proved that the most intensive selection cannot exceed the species barrier and he did it with Drosophila, the favorite pet animal of the Darwinian geneticists, an animal which has not changed in millions of years. Yet Dobzhansky remained a staunch Darwinian. Is it any wonder that I often declare -
It is hard to believe isn’t it?
It sure is!
In any event Skell and I had a fine conversation and while we didn’t agree about everything, we sure did on the failure of the Darwinian model.
I love it so!
“A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable.”
John A. Davison
Comment by John A. Davison — October 6, 2006 @ 9:46 am
|
--------------
It is fun to dip into the various threads to watch cluelessness at work in the hands of the confident exponent. - Soapy Sam (so say we all)
|
