JonF
Posts: 634
Joined: Feb. 2005
|
| Quote (Mike PSS @ Sep. 23 2006,13:27) |
I think Dave is working another angle on this. He thinks if he can discredit the "assumption" of original daughter isotopic concentration in radiometric age analysis then he doesn't have to state the classic fundy line of "accellerated decay rates in the past" to explain the measured half-lives. |
My opinion is that Davie doesn't think at all; he just regurgitates. He hasn't caught on that, if accelerated decay happened, all this stuff about excess argon and mixing and what-not is irrelevant. He also hasn't caught on (despite being told many times) that accelerated decay causes more problems than it solves; melting the Earth, killing people with the radioactivity from the radioactive atoms in their bodies, and what-not. Of course, accelerated decay is inherently and explicitly magic and not science.
|
