RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (202) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: AF Dave's UPDATED Creator God Hypothesis, Creation/Evolution Debate< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
deadman_932



Posts: 3094
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 04 2006,09:32   

PantyDancerDave says:
 
Quote
Spanked for 170 pages? You guys have been blown away, but you are too blind and committed to Millionsofyearsianism to see it...And I just put this list together from memory in about 5 minutes.  I will put together a more extensive list soon.

Well, let's see how good your memory is. I'll just use the first three items in your list...oh, and feel free to try to compile a more detailed extensive one, since that can be just as easily shown filled with lies, too.  
 
Quote
1) I showed you how "whale evolution" doesn't support evolution.
Not in this thread you didn't. Please cite the relevant page number in this thread.
 
Quote
2) I showed you in detail how ridiculous it is to say that apes and humans have a common ancestor. No one has ever showed me how the LCA date of 8 my was arrived at.

Er, you were told genetics and fossil data. The genetic data includes studies done on the now-available complete genomes of both humans and chimps. You were told about chromosome fusion,GULO, etc., and you were told to do your own homework, too. See page 21, this thread
 
Quote
3) I showed you the details of the RATE Helium diffusion experiment--another serious challenge to conventional earth ages, yet Deadman wants to perpetuate Henke's distortion about zircons being tested under pressure even though he was clearly shown why it is not the same as testing soft micas.

Beginning at page 35 of this thread and up to about page 100 at various places, JonF, myself and others  didn't just **say** how how pressure affects testing, you were shown that materials harder than zircon -- such as quartz and Pyrex glass -- has higher diffusion rates of helium at high pressures. You were given multiple evidences of how flawed Humphrey's claims were: He cherry-picked data, altered it, claimed he got zircons from a depth that he could not have, he never offered a temp/pressure history of the region...you were shown he misidentified the rock in which the zircons were found, you were shown humphreys ignored high levels of external helium in the area, you were shown evidence of recent volcanic events and how helium can be transported at those times, while heat causes permeability of the zircons, which were highly damaged and "metamict" You were shown that Helium testing can detect isotopes and that Humphreys, along with the other fraud he perpetrated, lied to you about such ratio-testing being done.

As you can see, your "memory" seems a bit patchy and selective...in fact, it seems you're just lying and delusional.

--------------
AtBC Award for Thoroughness in the Face of Creationism

  
  6047 replies since May 01 2006,03:19 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (202) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]