keiths
Posts: 2195
Joined: Jan. 2006
|
| Quote (2ndclass @ Aug. 28 2006,18:55) | | After all of these months on Dembski's blog, Dave still doesn't realize that design inferences are eliminative, not comparative. Dave, it's obvious that you haven't actually read Dembski's work, although you do read this thread. How about if you tell us which of Dembski's works you've read? |
Sgt. Tard is actually proud of the fact that he hasn't read Dembski's books:
| Quote | SaRtre - I independently arrived at most of Dembski’s conclusions without reading his work. You know the expression “great minds think alike”? Since you have no way of knowing let me assure you now that the expression is true.
Comment by DaveScot — August 13, 2005 @ 9:41 am |
You see, Dave and Dembski reached the same conclusions, even though Dave doesn't know what Dembski's conclusions are (beyond "some stuff was designed"). Therefore Dave is a genius.
Bonus tard quote from the same thread:
| Quote | Sartre
Biologists have no training in engineering. How can they recognize design?
You aren’t going to win this argument. I’m an autodidact. My knowledge of biology is extensive as is my knowledge of computers and machinery of all kinds.
Comment by DaveScot — August 13, 2005 @ 7:56 pm |
--------------
And the set of natural numbers is also the set that starts at 0 and goes to the largest number. -- Joe G
Please stop putting words into my mouth that don't belong there and thoughts into my mind that don't belong there. -- KF
|
