Acartia_Bogart
Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014
|
| Quote | Jack
July 5, 2021 at 4:57 pm
KF: WJM, it is clear, sadly: qed
How so?
Even C.S. Lewis acknowledged that experience means nothing without an interpretative framework. You seem to think your ontological framework is unassailable. But you can’t make the case for it for which all persons of good reason and experience and good will can agree. Arrogance is not an argument. Repeating your ontology over and over is not an argument. Denying reality is not an argument. Clutching your pearls is not an argument. Your ontology and epistemology are not self-evidence truths. If they were, you and (the very intelligent and clear) WJM would not be having a discussion.
QED denied.
120
Jack
July 5, 2021 at 5:30 pm
KF, to continue…
You get your consciousness for free, you get your senses and raw experiences for free, but you don’t get your ontology for free. So far, no sale. It seems like you know this and are arguing in bad faith. |
OK, who’s sock is Jack?
Link
|
