Acartia_Bogart
Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014
|
KF again avoiding a relevant issue that he can’t defend.
| Quote | NOTICE:
FOLKS, THE OH WHAT ABOUT THIS AND THAT RIFF ON DISTRACTIVE SIDE ISSUES HAS GONE ON IN THE FACE OF MY STRONG STATEMENT THAT THIS SHOULD NOT BE USED TO PULL THE DISCUSSION OFF TRACK.
IT IS A STRONG SIGN THAT OBJECTORS HAVE LOST THE EXCHANGE ON SUBSTANTIAL MERITS AND NOW WISH TO PULL THE TRIFECTA FALLACY: RED HERRING DISTRACTORS, LED AWAY TO STRAWMAN CARICATURES SOAKED IN AD HOMINEMS AND SET ALIGHT TO CREATE A TOXIC CONFUSING CLOUD OF NEEDLESS POLARISATION. PRECISELY, BECAUSE THE SUBSTANTIAL MATTER GOES WHERE THEY DO NOT WANT TO GO.
THERE WAS ALREADY A UD THREAD THAT DEALT WITH THE FASHIONABLE SEXUALLY TINGED PERVERSITIES OF THE DAY [HERE IS A CORRECTIVE BOOK ON THE CORE ISSUES] AND THERE IS NO GOOD REASON TO ALLOW THREAD AFTER THREAD TO BE DRAGGED OFF INTO THE SEWER OF EVER MORE BIZARRE PSYCHO-SEXUAL PATHOLOGIES TRIGGERED BY THE CROOKED YARDSTICK EFFECT.
THE CHOICE IS, RETURN TO RESPONSIBLE ON TOPIC DISCUSSION OR DISCIPLINARY ACTION, WHICH WILL OF COURSE BE DECRIED AS CENSORSHIP.
GIVEN THAT DILEMMA I WILL PICK THE LATTER EVERY TIME. THERE IS ENOUGH WARNING ON THE TABLE AT THIS POINT, AND VL I AM LOOKING STRAIGHT AT YOU AND NAMING YOU IN THE FULL PARLIAMENTARY SENSE. YOU CHOSE TO TRY TO PULL THE THREAD OFF TRACK ABOVE.
GEM OF TKI, THREAD OWNER |
|
